LetsSingIt  
HOME
ARTISTS
SOUNDTRACKS
FORUM
CHATROOM
MEMBERS
POLL
 
Forum  /  Politics/Religion  /  To clone or not to clone? that is the question!

To clone or not to clone? that is the question!

read 16 reaction(s)
@ 05-10-2003 09:18cold_as_ice is offline cold_as_ice  
75 posts
Ok. Should we or should we not clone the Tasmanian Tiger??
There has been alot of debat about it, but i just wona see what people actualy think!!
well hope u can help,
luv yaz,
ice XX



Showing posts 1-16 of 16Page 1 of 1

Discussion
0    @ 05-10-2003 09:19C4L is offline C4L 

21,398 posts
why have you posted it like 3 times???
0    @ 05-10-2003 09:25cold_as_ice is offline cold_as_ice 
75 posts
well coz not every 1 comez 2 the same areaz of the forom do they?? i thought if i posted them 3 times then i might have a betta chance o getting some replyez. i need this info for a school poject and i thought this way might get some results!!
luv yaz
ice XX
0    @ 05-10-2003 11:35Rass is offline Rass 
5,430 posts
yeah but only post once cause it pops up on the new topics and active topics part making it three times just annoys people

anyways my side of the debate (gets behind a deabate thingy and gets all serious)

no we should not clone them because that is playing god and i'm against cloning, and uhm...i had some other really professional things i could have said but i can't think of them so just to make it look like i know what i'm takling about i'm going to bull shit my way through time because sometimes they do that kind of thing in debates, dont they? anyways have you seen that movie Flatliners with Kevin Bacon and stuff, i mean man that movie made me cry and god that was a beautiful ending and Kevin Bacon looks gooooood with long hair but anyways back to the topic at hand, cloning is playing God and unless you have God on your name tag you should not play God because that is not a nice thing to do as you might make God have a temper tantrum and he might smote some of us (wide eyes) anyways no cloning is bad and i dont care if they're almost dead or something because it's just their time and sometimes things go extinct but do you think we should do something about it? not really, unless it's just like getting them to mate then i'm all for that but like cloning things is wrong and playing god and as i said he might smote us for that (wide eyes agian) and i dont want to be smitten ((yes i know that means something completely different )) and now i'm done

(steps down from the debate thingy and takes a bow) thank you! thank you! thank you! vote for me!
0    @ 05-10-2003 12:24Plantagenet is offline Plantagenet 

12,864 posts
not to clone...
0    @ 05-10-2003 15:02lbp116 is offline lbp116 
2,479 posts
Well, I say clone it....I don't think there's anything wrong with it...
0    @ 05-10-2003 15:04Rass is offline Rass 
5,430 posts
did you not read my debate speach?! we dont want to get smitten!
0    @ 05-10-2003 15:33Kickink192 is offline Kickink192 
6,823 posts
i believe we should, god gave us the minds that gave us the technology to clone. i dont see why we should not clone!
0    @ 05-10-2003 15:38NightShade is offline NightShade 
2,772 posts
I'm not religious, so the religious side of the argument doesn't really interest me, but i still respect your point of view.


I also don't think cloning should happen. There isn't actually a point to it. I'm all for science, but cloning is just going too far and there's no need in it. These scientists just want people to be in awe of them.
0    @ 05-10-2003 17:51Masterful_Ally is offline Masterful_Ally 
15,627 posts
lol Rass¬ I just read your er, debate speech - very nice! I couldn't make any sense of it though apart from the bit about god getting angry?! *shrugs*

Anyway, I say clone. It's highly probable its the human race who have driven this creature to the verge of distiction, as we have with so many other, so I think we should have to accept the responsibility of saving it - and if you think this 'god' you all talk of will be angry....then he must be the mean old testament god and I can't posssibly agree with him - let alone believe in him! lol. No offence intended to believers.

Ally xxx
0    @ 05-10-2003 18:04Just_Jamie is offline Just_Jamie 
12,876 posts
I'm all for cloning endangered species, as long as we do it in a very controlled and monitored way - no cloning dinosaurs!!!! and no cloning thousands of the animals - we need to calculate how many animals the natural habitat can sustain, etc., so we don't overpopulate.

Also, I have been following the brain stem cell research avidly - I absolutely think we should develop the ability to clone individual organs. I know that that would most definately have changed my life, in a very positive way, and it would cut down on the number of people who die simply because they can't get a transplant of some vital organ.
0    @ 05-10-2003 18:05Masterful_Ally is offline Masterful_Ally 
15,627 posts
*agrees*
0    @ 05-10-2003 21:35Puddle_of_sugar is offline Puddle_of_sugar 
3,690 posts
hmmmmm you know i think its a good thing for like endangered species and organs and stuff....but not of humans and like....i dunno, i just feel like maybe it could go too far u know? but other than that i think its a pretty good thing
0    @ 05-10-2003 21:55LowBrass is offline LowBrass 
703 posts
I think that cloning endangeres species is absolutely the right thing to do. We humans afterall, are the ones who have almost made them extinct. We need to do everything we can to preserve this particular breed of tiger as well as all endangered species. As far as it not being 'moral' or 'ethical', I really don't see what the problem is. We would be SAVING a species from extinction. I think that would be the RIGHT thing to do.

To sum it up, I believe that cloning is an extremely helpful tool, and as Jamie said, just as long as we don't try to clone dinousars. I mean, we all saw Jurassic Park, right?
0    @ 05-10-2003 22:00built2liv is offline built2liv 
5,278 posts
Jurassic Park would be sweet though...
0    @ 05-10-2003 22:25Milita is offline Milita 
1,369 posts
I agree with Jamie...it should be done but controlled... it's the only way to not lose lots of animals that are near to dissapear, I'll like my kids to know this animals not only by photographs!! And if we have the knowledge to do it, why not?
0    @ 06-10-2003 12:03Plantagenet is offline Plantagenet 

12,864 posts
I said no cloning, cause I believe abuses will be done anyway if you let it happen...

and, I also think it might be dangerous for the species. recently, someone spoke about cloning the Dodo, but that animal is like more than 200 years dead, how will it survive in this climate? it's much warmer now than it was then...do scientists think about that? And, you also have mutation, perhaps the Dodo wouldn't be like it was 200 years ago anymore because of mutations...
BROWSE:
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other
TOP ARTISTS:
Rihanna, Taylor Swift, Coldplay, Jason Mraz, Britney Spears, Jonas Brothers, Lil Wayne, Katy Perry, Miley Cyrus, Akon, T.I., Leona Lewis, Avril Lavigne, Ne-Yo, Pink, Paramore, Pussycat Dolls, The, Nickelback, Kanye West, Christina Aguilera, Chris Brown, Secondhand Serenade, Linkin Park, Jordin Sparks, Demi Lovato, Oasis, Metallica, Lady Gaga, Lifehouse, Beyonce, Eminem, Mariah Carey, Kings Of Leon, Evanescence, Slipknot, Camp Rock, Fall Out Boy, Avenged Sevenfold, Carrie Underwood, Celine Dion, Jack's Mannequin, Kelly Clarkson, Abba, M.I.A., Beatles, The, Colbie Caillat, Alicia Keys, Amy MacDonald, Danity Kane, Simple Plan
Copyright © 1998-2008 LetsSingIt | add to bookmarks | disclaimer | privacy policy | advertise on this site