LetsSingIt the internet lyrics database
en
3
Follow 0
Share
Add topic
Search
MISHAtTheDisco
0
MISHAtTheDisco | 12-03-2006 15:10
If you were 14, fell pregnant. Your bf stays/leaves u doesnt make a difference. Would you keep the baby or abort it?

Id abort it.
26 to 50 of 273 comments
page 2 of 11
babii_gurrl
0
babii_gurrl | 12-03-2006 21:16
well at 14 and then when i turn the age of 20 and know that i had given up a child .. i'd feel like shit. to abort it now when it has no clue and isn't even developed is an okay thing.
MERI_AN
0
MERI_AN | 12-03-2006 22:20
one word people:
ABSTINENCE!

If you have sex at 14 (OMG!!!!) you have to take the responsibility that comes with it. If you aren't mature enough to raise a child, then don't have sex! Aaaaaaaand there's no such thing as "safe sex" or whatever. Just wait until you get married for Christ's sake!
_X_
0
_X_ | 13-03-2006 02:31
14 years ago, my sister got pregnant at the age of 14. She kept the child and now I have an awesome 14 year old niece to hang out with!! My sister is a very strong person to deal with all the crap and everything is good now.

If you are not strong enough to handle a child then at least give it up for adoption.
Cheater138
0
Cheater138 | 13-03-2006 03:01
If you don't want to be a parent at 14 don't ahve sex. It's as simple as that.

I'm not against abortion at all, sometimes it is necessary. (ie rape, severe birth defects, pregnancy is harmful to the mother) But not when some kid thinks their immune to pregnancy or think of abortion as a way out. That's not right. If you think you're old enough to go screw someone then you better be prepared for anything that can come of it.

"I can't give the baby a good life" is also not a good excuse. There are many people out there who can't have kids that would take the one you don't want in a heartbeat. Hell, it'd probably be adopted before you even had it.

I'm kind of surprised at how many people said they'd abort. Opinions use to be alot different around here... heh
vandy
0
vandy | 13-03-2006 07:20
You can't have sex at your leisure and expect to be excused of all responsibility. Period. If nothing else, you're going to deal with the responsibility of emotional whatever.
MISHAtTheDisco
0
MISHAtTheDisco | 13-03-2006 07:25
14 yr olds shouldnt even be having sex. Its disgusting... but when 4 years ago you were only 10 years old do you really think its appropriate to bring it into the world? sure. you could adopt it but id rather abort it theres a pill out now called RU486 or something and its an abortion pill which you can take at any stage of pregnancy to abort the baby. I personally think this will up the abortion rate as it doesnt seem so bad as to having your baby sucked out of you.
Cheater138
0
Cheater138 | 13-03-2006 07:39
RU 486 is a chemical compound that, taken in pill form, can induce abortion in women up to nine weeks pregnant.

Hmm, I thought a pregnancy lasted 9 months. There is no pill you can take whenever you want to abort a pregnancy. They will invent one though, and the abortion rate is going to be disgusting.

Acting alone, RU486 is able to induce an abortion only between 64% and 85% of the time, a rate abortifacient researchers consider "inadequate for general clinical use." (27) This is why, two days after taking the RU486, a woman is given a prostaglandin, usually misoprostol (trade name: Cytotec), to induce powerful uterine contractions to expel the shriveled corpse. (28) Because the use of a prostaglandin (PG) is part of the standard RU486 abortion protocol, it is perhaps more accurate to refer to this as an "RU486/PG" abortion.

I want to know what happens the other 36 - 15% that the pill doesn't work. Wasted money and deformed child? And now instead of ripping a baby out of you they rip a shriviled corpse... that's sick.

Also if you go to the site I got that from it talks about how they give you a second med to induce contractions to expel the corpse. Which could take hours, days, weeks or may never happen. Some people who've used it have even had the corpse expel while driving home in their car/on the bus and at work. So much for keeping it under wraps. Some people are gonna be pretty nosey when a dead baby falls out of your skirt... geesh.
jennie_girl
0
jennie_girl | 13-03-2006 07:40
it is wrong to have a kid if your not mature enough


however - - - if your not mature enough to have a kid you shouldnt be having sex. what kind of idiot cant figure that one out?! i think the correct solution to this problem is to keep your pants on. and if your too stupid to figure out how to use a belt to hold your pants up, then its your own fault. dont give that crap about underpriveleged kids. i think being murdered is the most underpriveleged a id could get. so choose adoption.
DeadTeddyBear
0
DeadTeddyBear | 13-03-2006 09:52
i'd keep it
DeadTeddyBear
0
DeadTeddyBear | 13-03-2006 09:59
, you cant go back to school until the kid is like 13, the kid wouldnt be loved like a kid should. the kid would be missing a parent and it would know it wasnt menbt to be there

actually you can there are schools specialised in helpign people who still want education after having a baby. whilst they are in school there is usually a creche of some kind for the baby to stay, also with the basic education they get parenting classes as well.. we're not in the dark ages anymore, these have been around since the 70s these types of schools have.

plus abort is not always the answer, so what if the child has only one parent... there ar emany middle aed women with young children who only have one parent... two parents don't nessasrily make a stable family, or a loved child. there are many kids who are abused by non-teen parents, doesn't mean they are better off though, if they're mother or father isn't a teenager.
MISHAtTheDisco
0
MISHAtTheDisco | 13-03-2006 10:21
a kid shouldnt be brought into the world if the family is not stable. a 14 year old cannot provide a stable family...either can some 40 year olds. but the child should not be brought into a family that sint stable
DeadTeddyBear
0
DeadTeddyBear | 13-03-2006 13:51
a kid shouldnt be brought into the world if the family is not stable. a 14 year old cannot provide a stable family...either can some 40 year olds. but the child should not be brought into a family that sint stable

myfamily isn't stable my mum brought my bro my sis and me up on her own, and also who's to say that a two parent family is stable? Abuse cases have mainly come from families with two parents.

And in the modern day world anyway, single parent families no matter they're age, there is much more of them than the traditional family nowadays.
FireWaterBurn
0
FireWaterBurn | 15-03-2006 23:35
If I were a 14 year old, pregnant girl....I would abort as soon as possible.
6Dollie6
0
6Dollie6 | 15-03-2006 23:59
Sure about that Curtis? Chicks emotions are kinda weird and when it comes to having a child, you might be thinking "well im carrying this kid, MY kid, i cant just give it away like this" Sooo yeah, your opinion might be different if you were actually a pregnant chick.
FireWaterBurn
0
FireWaterBurn | 16-03-2006 00:00
No way, if I were a chick, I'd be a hott lesbian... who got knocked up during a drunken night...

and sexy lesbians don't have/want children.
6Dollie6
0
6Dollie6 | 16-03-2006 00:03
Did you have to add the 'hott' part in there?
FireWaterBurn
0
FireWaterBurn | 16-03-2006 00:03
Of course, I wouldn't be a Rosie odonell...I'd be a sapphicerotica chick.
6Dollie6
0
6Dollie6 | 16-03-2006 00:04
Dude, most of the chicks on that site, are ugly.

But thats just my opinion..
FireWaterBurn
0
FireWaterBurn | 16-03-2006 00:05
Well, I couldn't think of any hott lesbians...

....and actually they really aren't that attractive in the face, it's more about the body...

Hmmm, I don't think there are any celebrity lesbians that i find attractive.
sweet_J_
0
sweet_J_ | 16-03-2006 00:06
I'd keep it of course, but I wasn't screwing around at 14 anyways.
6Dollie6
0
6Dollie6 | 16-03-2006 00:08
The Tatu chicks are pretty hot, well the red head is anyways.

And yeah, why the fcuk would you mess around at 14 for?
TMacFaN
0
TMacFaN | 16-03-2006 00:16
Hello, if u dont want a baby at age 14 u should have had sex in the first place!! If you chose to do that, then you chose the consequences that come with it. Life is given at conception, not at the initial birth, I mean if you dont want it, just put it up for adoption.
If I had done sumthing foolish like that when i was fourteen and gotten pregnant, i would've kept it.....i am soooo glad my parents taught me to w8.
TMacFaN
0
TMacFaN | 16-03-2006 00:22
shouldnt* have had
jesusluver4ever
0
jesusluver4ever | 15-06-2006 18:34
have the baby, if you can't care for it, put it up for adoption, but don't take a life, even though that babie's not out of the womb yet, it doesn't mean it's not alive, and abortion is murder, it's killing innocent people, and it's not right, think if you were the baby, wouldn't you be thinking, "no! put me up for adoption, the me on someone's porch, just please don't kill me! give me a chance!" sorry if that was weird, but they have feelings too, don't kill God's creation!
jesusluver4ever
0
jesusluver4ever | 15-06-2006 18:38
i can't belive how many would abort, that's murder, not only that, but it's killing your own son/daughter. i think abortion is one of the worst things ever and never should have been invented!!!!!!!!!!
guest
guest
POP OUT SAVE saving ...
Read more: