General Discussion | Superbowl Halftime Show

Options: add reply
bookmark this topic
track this topic
track this category
start topic
rss

Poll for November 24
"Do you prefer music raw and uncut or do you like it edited?"
	raw and uncut
	edited

suggest a poll \| old polls

Superbowl Halftime Show


08-02-2005 01:49 TrOpIcAlTrEaT13
15 posts	Do you people like this year's superbowl half time show (wholesome) better than last years janet jackson incident? whats ur opinion on both? which do u prefer??

Showing posts 1-25 of 29

Page 1 of 2

Select page : [1] 2 next »

Reactions
08-02-2005 01:50 jsimms52
24,669 posts	missed this years show cuz i was on the crapper so im going with last years
08-02-2005 01:50 ellessilver
2,223 posts	It seemed really toned-down this year... Kind of a let-down for me. But hey, at least now I won't hear something about a "wardrobe malfunction" every time I turn on the tv...
08-02-2005 01:50 NIRVANAGUY98
1,602 posts	i never saw last years (damn) but i doubt it was a good as this years. Paul was so awesome, and that guy is just a musical genius.
08-02-2005 01:52 CynicalSadist
96 posts	Well its a hard choice between a. Nasty looking women...thing exposing herself b. Guy who couldn't sing to save his life. I'd have to go with b.
08-02-2005 01:52 broncoman892004
1,479 posts	I personally thought it was awsome, and i loved it, but i guess im a pretty big beatles fan and it was awsome to hear some of the beatles songs live.. I thought it was a LOT better than last years that boob malfunction hah i mean wordrobe malfunction was a peice of crap last year.
08-02-2005 01:53 helpme24get
964 posts	I liked it. Last years was weird, all crap music, nothing good. This year it was wholesome and classic, it was nice. I sang along really loud when he did Hey Jude.
08-02-2005 01:54 fishmunky
22,056 posts	you know what would have made this years super bowl halftime show awesome? some nipple
08-02-2005 01:56 NIRVANAGUY98
1,602 posts	What do you mean guy who couldnt sing to save his life?!?!?!?! May I remind you of a band called the beatles, one of the greatest bands in history, of which Paul was a singer. Besides, hes older now and has less of a voice, but he was still awesome!
08-02-2005 01:59 CynicalSadist
96 posts	Hey, everyone is entitled to his/her opinion. Though I'm probably the only one around here who can't stand the Beatles.
08-02-2005 02:00 Friend_Jones55
9,658 posts	I thought it was okay and all but I would have like it if there was more of a variety of people like I said before thats when the booing (Ashlee) and the nipples (Janet) starts to happen.
08-02-2005 02:00 ellessilver
2,223 posts	I can't stand them either...
08-02-2005 02:02 ellessilver
2,223 posts	* offtopic : And by "them", I meant the Beatles...
08-02-2005 02:11 indie_brain
2,312 posts	Really, the only quote unquote good thing that happened last year was nipple gate.the music was bullsht.this year's half time show music was 100 times better than last years.oh yeah and I'm one of the many people who ''can'' stand the Beatles and think they're genius. offtopic : I only saw half of Paul's performance cause I was watching the sneek peek of the new not improved MTV2
08-02-2005 02:20 hobbitongurl
4,053 posts	I didn't watch the superbowl but I heard that the halftime show was extremely boring..
08-02-2005 06:45 christurek28
1,600 posts	Horrible. go janet!
08-02-2005 11:55 snoopywoodstock
510 posts	I'm all about Paul! He is, after all, my favorite Beatle. I love his music and I think he did a wonderful show!
08-02-2005 15:54 Thrakk
323 posts	I was sad that Paul didn't sing band on the run but he did do live or let die
08-02-2005 19:20 cut_up_angel
278 posts	couldn't tell you because this year me and my boyfriend where "busy" during halftime. last year, i got sick of the janet deal. it was so stupid. so she flashed a boob, whats the big deal?
08-02-2005 19:21 cut_up_angel
278 posts	were* * offtopic : curse grammatical errors
09-02-2005 01:54 TrOpIcAlTrEaT13
15 posts	I think this years was better... last year was very annoying, a scam to get attention is the way i see it, this year was much better, with a guy that could actually sing and no "wardrobe malfunctions" ya... right...Ciao
09-02-2005 01:55 andrew4762
9,287 posts	i hated it......they need someone more today......not paul mccartney
09-02-2005 01:56 chloya
18,104 posts	Paul McCartney? Jesus.
09-02-2005 02:09 rawkerNoNagal
9,981 posts	Paul was amazing! Hey Jude was spectacular. i'm in love.
09-02-2005 02:12 CDNRoycer
1,617 posts	tuff choice, one one hand you have a good singer but not much theatrics, on the other hand you have crapy singer, but awsome theatrics
09-02-2005 04:45 tool_ley
96 posts	i dont think Paul McCartney and football go together very well